You must have heard the big news of the week⊠Twitterâs going pubÂlic. Want a piece?
Why?
âItâs hot. It should go up.â
If thatâs all you know about the comÂpaÂnyâs busiÂness, well, you might be as âuninÂformedâ as these peoÂple:
Excitement for Twitterâs comÂing IPO is runÂning pretÂty high â so much so that some investors on Friday misÂtook the nearÂly worthÂless stock of long-dead elecÂtronÂics retailÂer Tweeter for the âtweetÂingâ site, sendÂing shares up more than 1,000 perÂcent.
In fact, to find a link for this post I googled âtwitÂter files for IPOâ. First senÂtence of the first result?
Twitter has filed to go pubÂlic, sayÂing it will sell shares under the name TWTR.
It gives you the tickÂer symÂbol right there. How could you get it wrong and buy the wrong comÂpaÂny, even if you didÂnât realÂize their IPO hasÂnât hapÂpened yet ((In your exciteÂment you might have missed âwillâ in the 1st senÂtence; the 2nd senÂtence realÂly hamÂmers future tense home: âThe IPO will iniÂtialÂly seek to raise up to $1 bilÂlion.â))?
The stock marÂket has rules. If you donât even realÂize what filÂing a Sâ1 means, why are you buyÂing into an IPO (IPO sucÂcess is quite specÂuÂlaÂtive)? Let me rephrase. You can buy into the IPO, but realÂize that youâre not investÂing, youâre gamÂbling.
As it turns out, I have been asked priÂvateÂly ((I encourÂage stuÂdents to email me directly/privately if they have quesÂtions.)) what I think about the Twitter IPO. Heâs my response:
Itâs a risky bet (a techÂnolÂoÂgy IPO). The way most peoÂple should play this is, if they have an investÂment âbudÂgetâ for risky stuff (a reaÂsonÂable numÂber is about 10â15% of total investÂments), they could use Twitter as one of 4â5 things to purÂchase to diverÂsiÂfy their risk.
Of course, we need to think about how a âtradÂing stratÂeÂgyâ (Elephantâs Paycheck is not a tradÂing stratÂeÂgy, itâs a wealth buildÂing stratÂeÂgy) works for modÂest investors. If you were investÂing $100,000 â you might take $15,000 and put it into risky/speculative IPOâs. Of that $15,000 youâd split that between sevÂerÂal⊠You might see where Iâm going:
1. you should have a lot of monÂey if you want to specÂuÂlate rather than invest
2. even with a lot of monÂey, maybe youâre buyÂing $10,000 of Twitter⊠then what? Letâs say it douÂbles? You earn $10,000, give Uncle Sam $5,000 (est.) of that, and then have to invest in someÂthing else. What? The longer you take to decide, the longer you have no growth on that monÂey. Itâs not as comÂpelling as it looks⊠(Unless your broÂkerÂage can get you IPO shares, meanÂing, priced at the IPO price. This hapÂpens usuÂalÂly for preÂmier cusÂtomers â peoÂple with a milÂlion dolÂlars or more in their accounts.)
Look at Facebook. By the time regÂuÂlar peoÂple could have purÂchased it on the open marÂket, it was up from the IPO price. Then, it dropped, and for more than a year, was below the IPO price. Now itâs doing OK, but⊠how do you know that would have hapÂpened? Maybe they would have been like Groupon (rememÂber how hot that was? Itâs down over 50% over 2 years).
These are my thoughts biased by my Elephantâs Paycheck expeÂriÂence. Itâs cerÂtainÂly fun to buy someÂthing culÂturÂalÂly relÂeÂvant⊠but it realÂly is a gamÂble, not an investÂment. (Again, itâs difÂferÂent if you can get shares at the IPO price, or if you work there and have been accuÂmuÂlatÂing shares at some lowÂer valÂuÂaÂtion.)
Wish I had betÂter news about Twitter? Well, itâs a realÂly helpÂful tool. Why not conÂnect with Elephantâs Paycheck?
Donât use it? Why would you think about buyÂing IPO shares if you donât believe in the prodÂuct enough to use it? Remember, buildÂing wealth isnât about makÂing one good deciÂsion, itâs about a long term stratÂeÂgy. Try our free email course to learn how to get startÂed, stay motiÂvatÂed, and build wealth over time regardÂless of whether you ever âhitâ a big IPO.
Let me know what you think